Three Tombs of Jesus: Which is the Real One?

Screenshot (760)

The tomb in which they buried Jesus of Nazareth was empty that first Easter morning.  On this point the ancient eyewitnesses agree.1 The vast majority of modern scholars – critical or otherwise – also agree.2

There are three tombs in Jerusalem people point to as the place Jesus of Nazareth was originally laid to rest in.  Which one is the real one?  Is there archaeological and historical evidence that can provide an answer to this question?  Let’s analyze the claims of each tomb to see which site is the best candidate for being the actual place where Jesus was buried.

The Talpiot Family Tomb

Talpiot Tomb IAA
The Talpiot Family Tomb was discovered in 1980 and likely belonged to a middle class family in the first century. Photo Credit: Israel Antiquities Authority

Located about 5km south of the Old City of Jerusalem is the Talpiot Family Tomb.  It was originally discovered in 1980, but rose to fame with the 2007 Discovery Channel documentary, “The Lost Tomb of Jesus,” which was produced by James Cameron and directed by Simcha Jacobovici.

Ten ossuaries were discovered within the Tapiot tomb bearing names such as Jesus, Mary and Joseph.  The filmmakers identified one of the ossuaries bearing the inscription “Mariamene” as belonging to Mary Magdalene, suggesting she was married to Jesus.3 Only two of the ossuaries contained a patronym helpful in identification: “Jude, son of Jesus” and “Jesus, son of Joseph.” This has led some to conclude Jesus of Nazareth and Mary Magdalene had a son named Judah.  However, scholars have pointed out that the presence of names such as Jesus, Joseph and Mary is not as compelling an argument as the filmmakers made it out to be.  Simply put, they were among the most popular Hebrew names in the first century A.D.; Cameron and Jacobovici have read more into these names than is warranted.4

Supporters of the Talpiot tomb also point to DNA testing, which demonstrated that Jesus and Mariamene were not maternally related.  In the Discovery Channel documentary, the filmmakers use this as evidence to suggest they were married.  Critics have pointed out, however, that they could have been paternally related (ie. father and daughter, or grandfather and granddaughter).

Scholar James Tabor contends that that the famous “James, brother of Jesus” ossuary came from the Talpiot tomb, suggesting it was the family tomb of Jesus of Nazareth.  Chemical testing that was financed by filmmaker, Simcha Jacobvici, is often cited as evidence that the James ossuary came from the Talpiot tomb.   A “chemical fingerprint” is said to have been found on both, with similar trace amounts of phosphorus, chrome and nickel, components in the clay of East Jerusalem soil.  As impressive as this sounds, however, a very small sample size was used, calling into question the results.   Moreover, the James ossuary may have come from another tomb in East Jerusalem; the tests do not prove it came from the Talpiot tomb.  Also, the physical appearance of the James ossuary, with its pitted and worn surface is unlike the smooth limestone surfaces of the ossuaries from the Talpiot tomb.  Archaeologist, Shimon Gibson, who was one of the original excavators of the Talpiot tomb has stated, “I don’t think the James ossuary has anything to do with Talpiot.”5

It is interesting to note that, of the scholars interviewed for the documentary, all but James Tabor (who believes it is the family tomb of Jesus) have since objected to the way their statements were used and misrepresented.6  This, in and of itself, should give people pause in accepting the conclusions of the filmmakers.

Finally, the supporters of the Talpiot family tomb have failed to adequately explain the most obvious flaw in their theory: since Jesus’ family was from Galilee, why would they have a family tomb in Jerusalem?   Archaeologist, Jodi Magness, has pointed out that, at the time of Jesus, only wealthy families buried their families in rock-cut tombs and used the secondary burial practice of later interring the bones in ossuaries.  A poor family from Galilee would have used an ordinary grave.  Furthermore, Magness asserts that the names on the ossuaries from the Talpiot tomb indicates that the tomb belonged to a family from Judea, where people were known by their first name and father’s name, whereas Galileans would have used their first name and hometown.

Verdict: Amos Kloner, one of the original excavators of the Talpiot family tomb, sums it up best: “It makes a great story for a TV film. But it’s completely impossible. It’s nonsense. There is no likelihood that Jesus and his relatives had a family tomb. They were a Galilee family with no ties in Jerusalem. The Talpiot tomb belonged to a middle class family from the 1st century CE.“8

The Garden Tomb (or Gordon’s Tomb)

The Garden Tomb
The Garden Tomb, as it appeared in the 1920’s, was only identified as a possible site for the tomb of Jesus in the 19th century. Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

Another possible location for the tomb of Jesus is the Garden Tomb, popularized in 1883 by Charles Gordon (hence its alternate name – Gordon’s Tomb).  Its serene setting in a garden makes it a popular tourist destination, particularly with evangelical Christians, who come to see the spot where Jesus was buried.

The history of the Garden tomb is littered with questionable identification tactics, such as Gordon’s  belief that Jerusalem represented the shape of a skeleton with Skull Hill being the head9, and outright fraud, like Ron Wyatt’s claim to have found the Ark of the Covenant nearby.10

More importantly, no Second-Temple-era tombs have been found anywhere in the vicinity.11  Archaeologist, Gabriel Barkay, who has studied the tomb complex in which the Garden Tomb is located has concluded that it is an Iron Age tomb, dating to the 7th or 8th centuries B.C..  Its typology clearly resembles the other First-Temple era tombs in the area, particularly those on the property of the nearby Basilica of St. Stephen.12  The Garden Tomb was not a “new tomb in which no one had yet been laid” (John 19:41); it was already over 600 years old by the time of Jesus.

Verdict: While there is perhaps value in having a tomb in the peaceful setting of a garden which reminds people of what the original tomb setting may have been like, this is not the actual tomb of Jesus.

The Church of the Holy Sepulchre

While it doesn’t look much like a tomb anymore, this edicule surrounds the remains of purported tomb of Jesus within the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Photo Credit:

The site with the oldest attestation to being the resting place of Jesus of Nazareth lies within the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.  In his work, Life of Constantine, early Christian writer Eusebius described how the emperor ordered the removal of the pagan temple that Hadrian had built and the discovery of the tomb beneath.  He also wrote about Constantine’s order to construct a church to honor the site.13 Archaeological research has demonstrated that this was the site of a Jewish cemetery in an ancient limestone quarry outside the walls of Jerusalem at the time of Jesus’s death.14

Today a shrine called the edicule surrounds the remains of the ancient tomb.  As part of restorations in 2016 to clean and structurally improve the edicule, experts removed the limestone slab that covered the burial bed of the tomb for the first time in almost 500 years.  During the unsealing of the tomb, mortar samples from different locations in the structure which confirmed the construction date of the mid-4th century and the rebuilt crusader chapel from the middle ages.  The mortar was dated using a technique known as optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) that calculates the last time the quartz sediment was exposed to light. The tests were conducted independently at two separate labs.15  These tests affirmed the ancient written history of the site.

Verdict:  Archaeologist John McRay sums it up best: “Although absolute proof of the location of Jesus’ tomb remains beyond our reach, the archaeological and early literary evidence argues strongly for those who associate it with the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.”


The testimony of the earliest disciples is that they had witnessed Jesus of Nazareth alive after his death and burial.  They spent time with him, ate with him, touched him and listened to him teach.  For them, the empty tomb and their experience with their risen Lord formed the foundation of their belief in who Jesus was (God – John 20:28) and what he had done (died to pay the penalty for the sins of the world – 1 John 2:2).  The resurrection of Jesus was at the very heart of the gospel they preached (Acts 2:32-38) and remains the central teaching of Christianity 2000 years later.

Note on top banner photo:  This is not one of the purported tombs of Jesus.  This tomb is located on a road in Galilee from Mount Carmel to Megiddo near the Jezreel Valley.  It is one of the best examples of a first-century rolling stone tomb in all of Israel. It’s likely similar to the one in which Jesus was buried as the gospels record that the tomb in which Jesus was buried was sealed by a rolling stone (Matthew 27.60; Mark 15.46; Luke 24.2).


1 Matthew and John were disciples of Jesus who affirmed the empty tomb. (Matthew 28:1-10; John 20:1-10).  Eusebius records that Mark wrote the memories of Peter in the gospel he wrote, which testifies to the empty tomb (Mark 16:1-8).  Luke claims to have written an orderly account based on the testimonies of eyewitnesses (Luke 1:2-3) and he also records the empty tomb (Luke 24:1-12).  Furthermore, both those guarding the tomb and the Chief Priests who pushed for Jesus’s crucifixion acknowledged this fact and concocted a tale about the disciples stealing the body to explain the empty tomb (Matthew 28:11-15).  It is telling that the earliest witnesses to tomb being empty and to having met the risen Jesus were women, a class that was sadly discounted as unreliable in the first century.

2 Gary Habermas, “Resurrection Research from 1975 to the Present: What are Critical Scholars Saying?”  Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, 3.2 (2005), pp. 135-153. (Accessed April 10, 2019).

3 Gordon Franz, “The So-Called Jesus Family Tomb.” Associates for Biblical Research. March 17. 2007. (Accessed April 10, 2019).

4 For a good analysis of the actual inscriptions on the ossuaries as well as a statistical analysis of the rarity of these names I recommend Dr. Michael S. Heisler’s article, “Thinking Clearly About the ‘Jesus Family Tomb’” which was published in the Fall 2008 issue of Bible and Spade magazine.  It is available online here:

5 Ben Witherington, “Once More with Feeling— Did the James Ossuary come out of the Talpiot Tomb?”  The Bible and Culture. April 7, 2015. (Accessed March 30, 2020).

6 Michael S. Heiser, “Thinking Clearly About The ‘Jesus Family Tomb’.” Associates for Biblical Research. March 26, 2010. (Accessed April 11, 2019).

7 Alan Cooperman and the Washington Post, “Experts dismiss claim of finding Jesus’ tomb.” East Bay Times, March 3, 2007, updated August 17. 2016. (Accessed March 30, 2020).  

8 Gordon Franz, “The So-Called Jesus Family Tomb.” Associates for Biblical Research. March 17. 2007. (Accessed April 11, 2019).

9 John McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1991), 211-212.

10 Jonathan Gardner, “The Adventist Indiana Jones: Hoax or Hope?” The Compass Magazine, February 26, 2019. (Accessed April 12, 2019).

11 John McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1991), 207.

12 Gabriel Barkay, “The Garden Tomb – Was Jesus Buried Here?” Biblical Archaeology Review 12, no. 2 (March/April 1986): 40-57.

13 Eusebius, Life of Constantine, Book 3, Chapters 25-27.   Summarized here: Ancient Witnesses on the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. (Accessed April 12, 2019).

14 Kristen Romey, “Unsealing of Christ’s Reputed Tomb Turns Up New Revelations” National Geographic. October 31, 2016. (Accessed April 12, 2019).

15 Kristen Romey, “Exclusive: Age of Jesus Christ’s Purported Tomb Revealed” National Geographic. November 28, 2017. (Accessed April 12, 2019).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s